Monthly Archives: April 2017

br Discussion br Our study determined

Discussion

Our study determined the average excursion of the diaphragms during tidal breathing in a standing position in a health screening center cohort using dynamic chest radiography (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). These findings are important because they provide reference values of diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing useful for the diagnosis of diseases related to respiratory kinetics. Our study also suggests that dynamic X-ray phrenicography is a useful method for the quantitative evaluation of diaphragmatic motion with a radiation dose comparable to conventional posteroanterior chest radiography (22).

Our study demonstrated that the average excursions of the bilateral Otamixaban during tidal breathing (right: 11.0 mm, 95% CI 10.4 to 11.6 mm; left: 14.9 mm, 95% CI 14.2 to 15.5 mm) were numerically less than those during forced breathing in previous studies using other modalities 2; 7 ;  8. Using fluoroscopy, Alexander reported that the average right excursion was 27.5 mm and the average left excursion was 31.5 mm during forced breathing in the standing position in 127 patients (2). Using ultrasound, Harris et al. reported that the average right diaphragm excursion was 48 mm during forced breathing in the supine position in 53 healthy adults (7). Using MR fluoroscopy, Gierada et al. reported that the average right excursion was 44 mm and the average left excursion was 42 mm during forced breathing in the supine position in 10 healthy volunteers (8). The difference in diaphragmatic excursion during tidal breathing versus forced breathing is unsurprising.

Our study showed that the excursion and peak motion speed of the left diaphragm are significantly greater and faster than those of the right. With regard to the excursion, the results of our study are consistent with those of previous reports using fluoroscopy in a standing position 2 ;  3. However, in the previous studies evaluating diaphragmatic motion in the supine position, the asymmetric diaphragmatic motion was not mentioned 7 ;  8. The asymmetric excursion of the bilateral diaphragm may be more apparent in the standing position, but may not be detectable or may disappear in the supine position. Although we cannot explain the reason for the asymmetry in diaphragmatic motion, we speculate that the presence of the liver may limit the excursion of the right diaphragm. Regarding the motion speed, to the best of our knowledge this study is the first to evaluate it. The faster motion speed of the left diaphragm compared to that of the right diaphragm would be related to the greater excursion of the left diaphragm.

We found that higher BMI and higher tidal volume were independently associated with the increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm by both univariate and multivariate analyses, although the strength of these associations was weak. We cannot explain the exact reason for the correlation between BMI and the excursion of the diaphragm. However, a previous study showed that BMI is associated with peak oxygen consumption (23), and the increased oxygen consumption in an obese participant may affect diaphragmatic movement. Another possible reason is that lower thoracic compliance due to higher BMI may cause increased movement of the diaphragm for compensation. Regarding the correlation between tidal volume and excursion of the diaphragm, given that diaphragmatic muscle serves as the most important respiratory muscle, the result is to be expected. Considering our results, the excursion evaluated by dynamic X-ray phrenicography could potentially predict tidal volume.

Our study has several limitations. First, we included only 172 volunteers, and additional studies on larger participant populations are required to confirm these preliminary findings. Second, we evaluated only the motion of the highest point of the diaphragms for the sake of simplicity, and three-dimensional motion of the diaphragm could not be completely reflected in our results. However, we believe that this simple method would be practical and more easily applicable in a clinical setting.

br Conclusions br The time resolved quantitative

Conclusions

The time-resolved quantitative analysis of the diaphragms with dynamic X-ray phrenicography is feasible. The average excursions of the diaphragms are 11.0 mm (right) and 14.9 mm (left) during tidal breathing in a standing position in our health screening center cohort. The diaphragmatic motion of the left is significantly larger and faster than that of the right. Higher tidal volume and BMI are associated with increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm.

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Hideo Ogata, MD, PhD, Norihisa Motohashi, MD, PhD, Misako Aoki, MD, Yuka Sasaki, MD, PhD, and Hajime Goto, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Medicine; Yuji Shiraishi, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Surgery; and Masamitsu Ito, MD, PhD, Atsuko Kurosaki, MD, Yoichi Akiyama, RT, Kenta Amamiya, RT, and Kozo Hanai, RT, PhD, from the Department of Radiology, Fukujuji Hospital, for their important suggestions. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Alba Cid, MS, for editorial work on the manuscript. Yoshitake Yamada, MD, PhD, is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Appendix. Supplementary DataThe following is the supplementary data to this article:
To view the video inline, enable JavaScript on your browser. However, you can download and view the video by clicking on the icon belowVideo S1.
 A representative video of sequential chest radiographs obtained by chest dynamic radiography for the motion of the diaphragms (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). A board-certified radiologist placed a point of interest (red point) on the highest point of each aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor on the radiograph at the resting end-expiratory position. These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase. Based on locations of the points on sequential radiographs, the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (Fig 2c).Help with MP4 filesOptionsDownload video (1042 K)
Data S1.
 Multivariate analysis of associations between the excursions and participant demographics using age, gender, BMI, tidal volume, VC, FEV1, and smoking history as factors (Model 2).Help with DOCX filesOptionsDownload file (23 K)

The bilateral diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle. Diaphragmatic dysfunction is an underappreciated cause of respiratory difficulties and may be due to a wide variety of issues, including surgery, trauma, tumor, and infection (1). Several previous studies have evaluated diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy 2; 3; 4 ;  5, ultrasound 6 ;  7, magnetic resonance (MR) fluoroscopy (dynamic MR imaging [MRI]) 8; 9; 10; 11 ;  12, and computed tomography (CT) 13; 14; 15 ;  16. However, the data of the previous studies using ultrasound, MR fluoroscopy, or CT were obtained in a supine position 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15 ;  16, not in a standing position. Also, while the data of the previous studies using fluoroscopy were obtained in a standing position, the data were assessed under forced breathing 2 ;  3, not under tidal or resting breathing. Thus, diaphragmatic motion in a standing position during tidal breathing remains unclear, even though it is essential for understanding respiratory physiology in our daily life. Furthermore, the evaluation of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy, ultrasound, dynamic MRI, or CT has not been used as a routine examination because of limitations, including high radiation dose, small field of view, low temporal resolution, and/or high cost.
r>
Recently, dynamic chest radiography using a flat panel detector (FPD) system with a large field of view was introduced for clinical use. This technique can provide sequential chest radiographs with high temporal resolution during respiration (17), and the radiation dose is much lower than that of CT. Also, whereas CT and MRI are performed in the supine or prone position, dynamic chest radiology can be performed in a standing or sitting position, which is physiologically relevant. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed study has analyzed diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing by using dynamic chest radiography.

br Multiple linear regression analysis using all

Multiple linear regression analysis using all variables as factors (Model 1) demonstrated that weight, BMI, and tidal volume were independently associated with the bilateral excursion of the diaphragms (all P < 0.05) after adjusting for other clinical variables, including age, gender, smoking history, height, VC, %VC, FEV1, FEV1%, and %FEV1. There were no significant associations between the excursion of the diaphragms and variables including age, gender, smoking history, height, VC, %VC, FEV1, FEV1%, and %FEV1 (Table 4). Additionally, a multiple linear regression model using age, gender, BMI, tidal volume, VC, FEV1, and smoking history as factors (Model 2) was also fit as a sensitivity analysis, taking into account the correlation among variables (eg, BMI, height, and weight; VC and %VC; FEV1, FEV1%, and %FEV1). Model 2 (Supplementary Data S1) gave order GSK343 results consistent with Model 1 (Table 4): higher BMI and higher tidal volume were independently associated with the increased bilateral excursion of the diaphragms (all P < 0.05). The adjusted R2 in Model 1 was numerically higher than that in Model 2 (right, 0.19 vs. 0.16, respectively; left, 0.16 vs. 0.13, respectively).

Discussion

Our study determined the average excursion of the diaphragms during tidal breathing in a standing position in a health screening center cohort using dynamic chest radiography (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). These findings are important because they provide reference values of diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing useful for the diagnosis of diseases related to respiratory kinetics. Our study also suggests that dynamic X-ray phrenicography is a useful method for the quantitative evaluation of diaphragmatic motion with a radiation dose comparable to conventional posteroanterior chest radiography (22).

Our study demonstrated that the average excursions of the bilateral order GSK343 during tidal breathing (right: 11.0 mm, 95% CI 10.4 to 11.6 mm; left: 14.9 mm, 95% CI 14.2 to 15.5 mm) were numerically less than those during forced breathing in previous studies using other modalities 2; 7 ;  8. Using fluoroscopy, Alexander reported that the average right excursion was 27.5 mm and the average left excursion was 31.5 mm during forced breathing in the standing position in 127 patients (2). Using ultrasound, Harris et al. reported that the average right diaphragm excursion was 48 mm during forced breathing in the supine position in 53 healthy adults (7). Using MR fluoroscopy, Gierada et al. reported that the average right excursion was 44 mm and the average left excursion was 42 mm during forced breathing in the supine position in 10 healthy volunteers (8). The difference in diaphragmatic excursion during tidal breathing versus forced breathing is unsurprising.

Our study showed that the excursion and peak motion speed of the left diaphragm are significantly greater and faster than those of the right. With regard to the excursion, the results of our study are consistent with those of previous reports using fluoroscopy in a standing position 2 ;  3. However, in the previous studies evaluating diaphragmatic motion in the supine position, the asymmetric diaphragmatic motion was not mentioned 7 ;  8. The asymmetric excursion of the bilateral diaphragm may be more apparent in the standing position, but may not be detectable or may disappear in the supine position. Although we cannot explain the reason for the asymmetry in diaphragmatic motion, we speculate that the presence of the liver may limit the excursion of the right diaphragm. Regarding the motion speed, to the best of our knowledge this study is the first to evaluate it. The faster motion speed of the left diaphragm compared to that of the right diaphragm would be related to the greater excursion of the left diaphragm.

br AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Hideo Ogata, MD, PhD, Norihisa Motohashi, MD, PhD, Misako Aoki, MD, Yuka Sasaki, MD, PhD, and Hajime Goto, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Medicine; Yuji Shiraishi, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Surgery; and Masamitsu Ito, MD, PhD, Atsuko Kurosaki, MD, Yoichi Akiyama, RT, Kenta Amamiya, RT, and Kozo Hanai, RT, PhD, from the Department of Radiology, Fukujuji Hospital, for their important suggestions. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Alba Cid, MS, for editorial work on the manuscript. Yoshitake Yamada, MD, PhD, is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Appendix. Supplementary DataThe following is the supplementary data to this article:
To view the video inline, enable JavaScript on your browser. However, you can download and view the video by clicking on the icon belowVideo S1.
 A representative video of sequential chest radiographs obtained by chest dynamic radiography for the motion of the diaphragms (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). A board-certified radiologist placed a point of interest (red point) on the highest point of each purchase Quercetin dihydrate on the radiograph at the resting end-expiratory position. These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase. Based on locations of the points on sequential radiographs, the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (Fig 2c).Help with MP4 filesOptionsDownload video (1042 K)
Data S1.
 Multivariate analysis of associations between the excursions and participant demographics using age, gender, BMI, tidal volume, VC, FEV1, and smoking history as factors (Model 2).Help with DOCX filesOptionsDownload file (23 K)

The bilateral diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle. Diaphragmatic dysfunction is an underappreciated cause of respiratory difficulties and may be due to a wide variety of issues, including surgery, trauma, tumor, and infection (1). Several previous studies have evaluated diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy 2; 3; 4 ;  5, ultrasound 6 ;  7, magnetic resonance (MR) fluoroscopy (dynamic MR imaging [MRI]) 8; 9; 10; 11 ;  12, and computed tomography (CT) 13; 14; 15 ;  16. However, the data of the previous studies using ultrasound, MR fluoroscopy, or CT were obtained in a supine position 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15 ;  16, not in a standing position. Also, while the data of the previous studies using fluoroscopy were obtained in a standing position, the data were assessed under forced breathing 2 ;  3, not under tidal or resting breathing. Thus, diaphragmatic motion in a standing position during tidal breathing remains unclear, even though it is essential for understanding respiratory physiology in our daily life. Furthermore, the evaluation of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy, ultrasound, dynamic MRI, or CT has not been used as a routine examination because of limitations, including high radiation dose, small field of view, low temporal resolution, and/or high cost.

Recently, dynamic chest radiography using a flat panel detector (FPD) system with a large field of view was introduced for clinical use. This technique can provide sequential chest radiographs with high temporal resolution during respiration (17), and the radiation dose is much lower than that of CT. Also, whereas CT and MRI are performed in the supine or prone position, dynamic chest radiology can be performed in a standing or sitting position, which is physiologically relevant. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed study has analyzed diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing by using dynamic chest radiography.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing in a standing position in a health screening center cohort using dynamic chest radiography in association with participants\’ demographic characteristics.

br Conclusions br The time resolved

Conclusions

The time-resolved quantitative analysis of the diaphragms with dynamic X-ray phrenicography is feasible. The average excursions of the diaphragms are 11.0 mm (right) and 14.9 mm (left) during tidal breathing in a standing position in our health screening center cohort. The diaphragmatic motion of the left is significantly larger and faster than that of the right. Higher tidal volume and BMI are associated with increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm.

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Hideo Ogata, MD, PhD, Norihisa Motohashi, MD, PhD, Misako Aoki, MD, Yuka Sasaki, MD, PhD, and Hajime Goto, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Medicine; Yuji Shiraishi, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Surgery; and Masamitsu Ito, MD, PhD, Atsuko Kurosaki, MD, Yoichi Akiyama, RT, Kenta Amamiya, RT, and Kozo Hanai, RT, PhD, from the Department of Radiology, Fukujuji Hospital, for their important suggestions. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Alba Cid, MS, for editorial work on the manuscript. Yoshitake Yamada, MD, PhD, is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Appendix. Supplementary DataThe following is the supplementary data to this article:
To view the video inline, enable JavaScript on your browser. However, you can download and view the video by clicking on the icon belowVideo S1.
 A representative video of sequential chest radiographs obtained by chest dynamic radiography for the motion of the diaphragms (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). A board-certified radiologist placed a point of interest (red point) on the highest point of each sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator on the radiograph at the resting end-expiratory position. These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase. Based on locations of the points on sequential radiographs, the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (Fig 2c).Help with MP4 filesOptionsDownload video (1042 K)
Data S1.
 Multivariate analysis of associations between the excursions and participant demographics using age, gender, BMI, tidal volume, VC, FEV1, and smoking history as factors (Model 2).Help with DOCX filesOptionsDownload file (23 K)

The bilateral diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle. Diaphragmatic dysfunction is an underappreciated cause of respiratory difficulties and may be due to a wide variety of issues, including surgery, trauma, tumor, and infection (1). Several previous studies have evaluated diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy 2; 3; 4 ;  5, ultrasound 6 ;  7, magnetic resonance (MR) fluoroscopy (dynamic MR imaging [MRI]) 8; 9; 10; 11 ;  12, and computed tomography (CT) 13; 14; 15 ;  16. However, the data of the previous studies using ultrasound, MR fluoroscopy, or CT were obtained in a supine position 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15 ;  16, not in a standing position. Also, while the data of the previous studies using fluoroscopy were obtained in a standing position, the data were assessed under forced breathing 2 ;  3, not under tidal or resting breathing. Thus, diaphragmatic motion in a standing position during tidal breathing remains unclear, even though it is essential for understanding respiratory physiology in our daily life. Furthermore, the evaluation of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy, ultrasound, dynamic MRI, or CT has not been used as a routine examination because of limitations, including high radiation dose, small field of view, low temporal resolution, and/or high cost.

Recently, dynamic chest radiography using a flat panel detector (FPD) system with a large field of view was introduced for clinical use. This technique can provide sequential chest radiographs with high temporal resolution during respiration (17), and the radiation dose is much lower than that of CT. Also, whereas CT and MRI are performed in the supine or prone position, dynamic chest radiology can be performed in a standing or sitting position, which is physiologically relevant. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed study has analyzed diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing by using dynamic chest radiography.

br Conclusions br The time resolved quantitative analysis of the

Conclusions

The time-resolved quantitative analysis of the diaphragms with dynamic X-ray phrenicography is feasible. The average excursions of the diaphragms are 11.0 mm (right) and 14.9 mm (left) during tidal breathing in a standing position in our health screening center cohort. The diaphragmatic motion of the left is significantly larger and faster than that metabolic enzymes of the right. Higher tidal volume and BMI are associated with increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm.

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Hideo Ogata, MD, PhD, Norihisa Motohashi, MD, PhD, Misako Aoki, MD, Yuka Sasaki, MD, PhD, and Hajime Goto, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Medicine; Yuji Shiraishi, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Surgery; and Masamitsu Ito, MD, PhD, Atsuko Kurosaki, MD, Yoichi Akiyama, RT, Kenta Amamiya, RT, and Kozo Hanai, RT, PhD, from the Department of Radiology, Fukujuji Hospital, for their important suggestions. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Alba Cid, MS, for editorial work on the manuscript. Yoshitake Yamada, MD, PhD, is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Appendix. Supplementary DataThe following is the supplementary data to this article:
To view the video inline, enable JavaScript on your browser. However, you can download and view the video by clicking on the icon belowVideo S1.
 A representative video of sequential chest radiographs obtained by chest dynamic radiography for the motion of the diaphragms (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). A board-certified radiologist placed a point of interest (red point) on the highest point of each diaphragm on the radiograph at the resting end-expiratory position. These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase. Based on locations of the points on sequential radiographs, the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (Fig 2c).Help with MP4 filesOptionsDownload video (1042 K)
Data S1.
 Multivariate analysis of associations between the excursions and participant demographics using age, gender, BMI, tidal volume, VC, FEV1, and smoking history as factors (Model 2).Help with DOCX filesOptionsDownload file (23 K)

br Conclusions br The time resolved quantitative

Conclusions

The time-resolved quantitative analysis of the diaphragms with dynamic X-ray phrenicography is feasible. The average excursions of the diaphragms are 11.0 mm (right) and 14.9 mm (left) during tidal breathing in a standing position in our health screening center cohort. The diaphragmatic motion of the left is significantly larger and faster than that of the right. Higher tidal volume and BMI are associated with increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm.

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Hideo Ogata, MD, PhD, Norihisa Motohashi, MD, PhD, Misako Aoki, MD, Yuka Sasaki, MD, PhD, and Hajime Goto, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Medicine; Yuji Shiraishi, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Surgery; and Masamitsu Ito, MD, PhD, Atsuko Kurosaki, MD, Yoichi Akiyama, RT, Kenta Amamiya, RT, and Kozo Hanai, RT, PhD, from the Department of Radiology, Fukujuji Hospital, for their important suggestions. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Alba Cid, MS, for editorial work on the manuscript. Yoshitake Yamada, MD, PhD, is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Appendix. Supplementary DataThe following is the supplementary data to this article:
To view the video inline, enable JavaScript on your browser. However, you can download and view the video by clicking on the icon belowVideo S1.
 A representative video of sequential chest radiographs obtained by chest dynamic radiography for the motion of the diaphragms (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). A board-certified radiologist placed a point of interest (red point) on the highest point of each BV6 on the radiograph at the resting end-expiratory position. These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase. Based on locations of the points on sequential radiographs, the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (Fig 2c).Help with MP4 filesOptionsDownload video (1042 K)
Data S1.
 Multivariate analysis of associations between the excursions and participant demographics using age, gender, BMI, tidal volume, VC, FEV1, and smoking history as factors (Model 2).Help with DOCX filesOptionsDownload file (23 K)

The bilateral diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle. Diaphragmatic dysfunction is an underappreciated cause of respiratory difficulties and may be due to a wide variety of issues, including surgery, trauma, tumor, and infection (1). Several previous studies have evaluated diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy 2; 3; 4 ;  5, ultrasound 6 ;  7, magnetic resonance (MR) fluoroscopy (dynamic MR imaging [MRI]) 8; 9; 10; 11 ;  12, and computed tomography (CT) 13; 14; 15 ;  16. However, the data of the previous studies using ultrasound, MR fluoroscopy, or CT were obtained in a supine position 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15 ;  16, not in a standing position. Also, while the data of the previous studies using fluoroscopy were obtained in a standing position, the data were assessed under forced breathing 2 ;  3, not under tidal or resting breathing. Thus, diaphragmatic motion in a standing position during BV6 tidal breathing remains unclear, even though it is essential for understanding respiratory physiology in our daily life. Furthermore, the evaluation of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy, ultrasound, dynamic MRI, or CT has not been used as a routine examination because of limitations, including high radiation dose, small field of view, low temporal resolution, and/or high cost.

Recently, dynamic chest radiography using a flat panel detector (FPD) system with a large field of view was introduced for clinical use. This technique can provide sequential chest radiographs with high temporal resolution during respiration (17), and the radiation dose is much lower than that of CT. Also, whereas CT and MRI are performed in the supine or prone position, dynamic chest radiology can be performed in a standing or sitting position, which is physiologically relevant. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed study has analyzed diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing by using dynamic chest radiography.

br Discussion br Our study determined the average excursion of

Discussion

Our study determined the average excursion of the diaphragms during tidal breathing in a standing position in a health screening center cohort using dynamic Erismodegib chest radiography (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). These findings are important because they provide reference values of diaphragmatic motion during tidal breathing useful for the diagnosis of diseases related to respiratory kinetics. Our study also suggests that dynamic X-ray phrenicography is a useful method for the quantitative evaluation of diaphragmatic motion with a radiation dose comparable to conventional posteroanterior chest radiography (22).

Our study demonstrated that the average excursions of the bilateral Erismodegib during tidal breathing (right: 11.0 mm, 95% CI 10.4 to 11.6 mm; left: 14.9 mm, 95% CI 14.2 to 15.5 mm) were numerically less than those during forced breathing in previous studies using other modalities 2; 7 ;  8. Using fluoroscopy, Alexander reported that the average right excursion was 27.5 mm and the average left excursion was 31.5 mm during forced breathing in the standing position in 127 patients (2). Using ultrasound, Harris et al. reported that the average right diaphragm excursion was 48 mm during forced breathing in the supine position in 53 healthy adults (7). Using MR fluoroscopy, Gierada et al. reported that the average right excursion was 44 mm and the average left excursion was 42 mm during forced breathing in the supine position in 10 healthy volunteers (8). The difference in diaphragmatic excursion during tidal breathing versus forced breathing is unsurprising.

Our study showed that the excursion and peak motion speed of the left diaphragm are significantly greater and faster than those of the right. With regard to the excursion, the results of our study are consistent with those of previous reports using fluoroscopy in a standing position 2 ;  3. However, in the previous studies evaluating diaphragmatic motion in the supine position, the asymmetric diaphragmatic motion was not mentioned 7 ;  8. The asymmetric excursion of the bilateral diaphragm may be more apparent in the standing position, but may not be detectable or may disappear in the supine position. Although we cannot explain the reason for the asymmetry in diaphragmatic motion, we speculate that the presence of the liver may limit the excursion of the right diaphragm. Regarding the motion speed, to the best of our knowledge this study is the first to evaluate it. The faster motion speed of the left diaphragm compared to that of the right diaphragm would be related to the greater excursion of the left diaphragm.

We found that higher BMI and higher tidal volume were independently associated with the increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm by both univariate and multivariate analyses, although the strength of these associations was weak. We cannot explain the exact reason for the correlation between BMI and the excursion of the diaphragm. However, a previous study showed that BMI is associated with peak oxygen consumption (23), and the increased oxygen consumption in an obese participant may affect diaphragmatic movement. Another possible reason is that lower thoracic compliance due to higher BMI may cause increased movement of the diaphragm for compensation. Regarding the correlation between tidal volume and excursion of the diaphragm, given that diaphragmatic muscle serves as the most important respiratory muscle, the result is to be expected. Considering our results, the excursion evaluated by dynamic X-ray phrenicography could potentially predict tidal volume.

Our study has several limitations. First, we included only 172 volunteers, and additional studies on larger participant populations are required to confirm these preliminary findings. Second, we evaluated only the motion of the highest point of the diaphragms for the sake of simplicity, and three-dimensional motion of the diaphragm could not be completely reflected in our results. However, we believe that this simple method would be practical and more easily applicable in a clinical setting.

br Our study showed that

Our study showed that the excursion and peak motion speed of the left hcv protease inhibitor are significantly greater and faster than those of the right. With regard to the excursion, the results of our study are consistent with those of previous reports using fluoroscopy in a standing position 2 ;  3. However, in the previous studies evaluating diaphragmatic motion in the supine position, the asymmetric diaphragmatic motion was not mentioned 7 ;  8. The asymmetric excursion of the bilateral diaphragm may be more apparent in the standing position, but may not be detectable or may disappear in the supine position. Although we cannot explain the reason for the asymmetry in diaphragmatic motion, we speculate that the presence of the liver may limit the excursion of the right diaphragm. Regarding the motion speed, to the best of our knowledge this study is the first to evaluate it. The faster motion speed of the left diaphragm compared to that of the right diaphragm would be related to the greater excursion of the left diaphragm.

We found that higher BMI and higher tidal volume were independently associated with the increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm by both univariate and multivariate analyses, although the strength of these associations was weak. We cannot explain the exact reason for the correlation between BMI and the excursion of the diaphragm. However, a previous study showed that BMI is associated with peak oxygen consumption (23), and the increased oxygen consumption in an obese participant may affect diaphragmatic movement. Another possible reason is that lower thoracic compliance due to higher BMI may cause increased movement of the diaphragm for compensation. Regarding the correlation between tidal volume and excursion of the diaphragm, given that diaphragmatic muscle serves as the most important respiratory muscle, the result is to be expected. Considering our results, the excursion evaluated by dynamic X-ray phrenicography could potentially predict tidal volume.

Our study has several limitations. First, we included only 172 volunteers, and additional studies on larger participant populations are required to confirm these preliminary findings. Second, we evaluated only the motion of the highest point of the diaphragms for the sake of simplicity, and three-dimensional motion of the diaphragm could not be completely reflected in our results. However, we believe that this simple method would be practical and more easily applicable in a clinical setting.

Conclusions

The time-resolved quantitative analysis of the diaphragms with dynamic X-ray phrenicography is feasible. The average excursions of the diaphragms are 11.0 mm (right) and 14.9 mm (left) during tidal breathing in a standing position in our health screening center cohort. The diaphragmatic motion of the left is significantly larger and faster than that of the right. Higher tidal volume and BMI are associated with increased excursions of the bilateral diaphragm.

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Hideo Ogata, MD, PhD, Norihisa Motohashi, MD, PhD, Misako Aoki, MD, Yuka Sasaki, MD, PhD, and Hajime Goto, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Medicine; Yuji Shiraishi, MD, PhD, from the Department of Respiratory Surgery; and Masamitsu Ito, MD, PhD, Atsuko Kurosaki, MD, Yoichi Akiyama, RT, Kenta Amamiya, RT, and Kozo Hanai, RT, PhD, from the Department of Radiology, Fukujuji Hospital, for their important suggestions. The authors also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Alba Cid, MS, for editorial work on the manuscript. Yoshitake Yamada, MD, PhD, is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Appendix. Supplementary DataThe following is the supplementary data to this article:
To view the video inline, enable JavaScript on your browser. However, you can download and view the video by clicking on the icon belowVideo S1.

br Figure thinsp xA Flow

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study population.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload high-quality image (83 K)Download as PowerPoint slide

Imaging Protocol of Dynamic Chest Radiology (“Dynamic X-Ray Phrenicography”)

Posteroanterior dynamic chest radiography (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”) was performed using a prototype system (Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) composed of an FPD (PaxScan 4030CB, Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA) and a pulsed X-ray generator (DHF-155HII with Cineradiography option, Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). All participants were scanned in the standing position and instructed to breathe normally in a relaxed way without deep inspiration or expiration (tidal breathing). The exposure conditions were as follows: tube voltage, 100 kV; tube current, 50 mA; pulse duration of pulsed X-ray, 1.6 ms; source-to-image distance, 2 m; additional filter, 0.5 mm Al + 0.1 mm Cu. The additional filter was used to filter out soft X-rays. The exposure time was approximately 10–15 seconds. The pixel size was 388 × 388 µm, the matrix size was 1024  × 768, and the overall image area was 40 × 30 cm. The gray-level range of the images was 16,384 (14 bits), and the signal intensity was proportional to the incident exposure of the X-ray detector. The dynamic image data, captured at 15 frames/s, were synchronized with the pulsed X-ray. The pulsed X-ray prevented excessive integrin signaling pathway exposure to the subjects. The entrance surface dose was approximately 0.3–0.5 mGy.

Image Analysis

The diaphragmatic motions on sequential chest radiographs (dynamic image data) during tidal breathing were analyzed using prototype software (Konica Minolta, Inc.) installed in an independent workstation (Operating system: Windows 7 Pro SP1; Microsoft, Redmond WA; CPU: Intel Core i5-5200U, 2.20 GHz; memory 16 GB). The edges of the diaphragms on each dynamic chest radiograph were automatically determined by means of edge detection using a Prewitt Filter 18 ;  19. A board-certified radiologist with 14 years of experience in interpreting chest radiography selected the highest point of each diaphragm as the point of interest on the radiograph of the resting end-expiratory position (Fig 2a). These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase (Fig 2b, Supplementary Video S1), and the vertical excursions of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (Fig 2c): the null point was set at the end of the expiratory phase, that is, the lowest point (0 mm) of the excursion on the graph is the highest point of each diaphragm at the resting end-expiratory position. Then the peak motion speed of each diaphragm was calculated during inspiration and expiration by the differential method (Fig 2c). If several respiratory cycles were involved in the 10 to 15-second examination time, the averages of the measurements were calculated.

Figure 2. Representative sequential chest radiographs and the graphs of excursion and peak motion of the diaphragms obtained by chest dynamic radiography (“dynamic X-ray phrenicography”). (a) Radiograph of the resting end-expiratory position. (b) Radiograph of the resting end-inspiratory position. (c) Graph showing the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm. A board-certified radiologist placed a point of interest (red point) on the highest point of each diaphragm on the radiograph at the resting end-expiratory position (a). These points were automatically traced by the template-matching technique throughout the respiratory phase (double arrows in b) (Supplementary Video S1); red double arrow indicates the vertical excursion of the right diaphragm and blue double arrow indicates that of the left diaphragm. Based on locations of the points on sequential radiographs, the vertical excursions and the peak motion speeds of the bilateral diaphragm were calculated (c). The lowest point (0 mm) of the excursion on the graph indicated that the highest point of each diaphragm was at the resting end-expiratory position (ie, null point was set at the end-expiratory phase) (c). (Color version of figure is available online.)Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload high-quality image (305 K)Download as PowerPoint slide